What do humans sound like to dogs

The researchers discovered that dogs — like humans — respond not only to the words we say to them, but also to the emotional tone of our voices. In humans, the left hemisphere of the brain tackles most verbal processing — the what we say part. Speech using exaggerated, positive vocal inflection — the how we say it part — is processed in the right hemisphere.

The dogs in the study demonstrated that they listen the same way — an ability that was once believed to be unique to humans. When unfamiliar language was presented to them, their focus shifted from linguistic content to emotional content. Turns out our pups do the same thing when they hear unfamiliar speech. Brain scans taken during the study showed the dogs were not fooled. Researchers could tell because the left hemisphere of the brain was not activated.

The findings contradict the assumption that dogs only understand the tone of our voices and have no idea what our words mean. Senses 42, — Fitch, W.

Social cognition and the evolution of language: constructing cognitive phylogenies. Neuron 65, — Fredericks, R. Troubling others and tormenting ourselves: The nature and moral significance of jealousy. University of Washington. Fugazza, C. Deferred imitation and declarative memory in domestic dogs. Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills.

PLoS One 4:e Attachment behavior of adult dogs Canis familiaris living at rescue centers: forming new bonds. Hare, B. The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science , — Human-like social skills in dogs? Harris, C. Jealousy in dogs. PLoS One 9:e Hecht, J. Behavioral assessment and owner perceptions of behaviors associated with guilt in dogs. Hens, K. Ethical responsibilities towards dogs: an inquiry into the dog—human relationship.

Ethics 22, 3— Herrmann, E. Heyes, C. Four routes of cognitive evolution. Horn, L. The importance of the secure base effect for domestic dogs - evidence from a manipulative problem-solving task. PLoS One 8:e Domestic dogs Canis familiaris flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation.

Horner, V. Horowitz, A. Disambiguating the guilty look: salient prompts to a familiar dog behavior. Huber, L. How dogs perceive and understand us. Huber, A. Investigating emotional contagion in dogs Canis familiaris to emotional sounds of humans and conspecifics. Would dogs copy irrelevant actions from their human caregiver? Discrimination of familiar human faces in dogs Canis familiaris. Horowitz Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag , 79— The evolution of imitation: what do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?

B Biol. Selective overimitation in dogs. Humphrey, N. Bateson and R. Hinde Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , — Hursthouse, R. Beauchamp and R. Irvine, L. Pampered or enslaved? The moral dilemmas of pets. Policy 24, 5— Johnston, A. Exploring the evolutionary origins of overimitation: a comparison across domesticated and non-domesticated canids. Kaminski, J. The social dog: Behaviour and cognition. Do dogs get the point?

A review of dog—human communication ability. Dogs steal in the dark. How dogs know when communication is intended for them. Domestic dogs comprehend human communication with iconic signs. Keupp, S. Why do children overimitate? Normativity is crucial. Child Psychol. Kis, A. Object permanence in adult common marmosets Callithrix jacchus : not everything is an "A-not-B" error that seems to be one.

Klinghammer, E. Frank Dordrecht: W. Junk Publishers , 31— Jealousy revisited: recent philosophical work on a maligned emotion. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 3, 1— Kubinyi, E. Dogs Canis familiaris learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task.

Kupan, K. Why do dogs Canis familiaris select the empty container in an observational learning task? Lea, S. In what sense are dogs special? Canine cognition in comparative context. Lindsay, S. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing, — Lyons, D. The hidden structure of overimitation. Macpherson, K. Do dogs Canis familiaris seek help in an emergency?

Maginnity, M. Visual perspective taking by dogs Canis familiaris in a guesser-knower task: evidence for a canine theory of mind? Marshall-Pescini, S. Do dogs Canis lupus familiaris make counterproductive choices because they are sensitive to human ostensive cues? PLoS One 7:e McKinley, J. Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs Canis familiaris and horses Equus caballus. Merola, I.

Social referencing in dog-owner dyads? Mersmann, D. Simple mechanisms can explain social learning in domestic dogs Canis familiaris. Ethology , — A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. What does it take to become 'best friends'? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence. Milan, C. How to be the pack leader. Miller, H. Imitation and emulation by dogs using a bidirectional control procedure.

Mills, D. Kaminski and S. Empathy and morality in behaviour readers. Morality without mindreading. Mind Lang. Animal morality: what it means and why it matters.

Ethics 22, — Dogs can discriminate emotional expressions of human faces. Myers, B. Mother—infant bonding: the status of this critical-period hypothesis. Naderi, S. Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs. Nagasawa, M. Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions. Nawroth, C. Linking behaviour, welfare and ethics. Nielsen, M. Copying actions and copying outcomes: social learning through the second year.

Nussbaum, M. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Ostojic, L. Behavioural coordination of dogs in a cooperative problem-solving task with a conspecific and a human partner. Palagi, E. Rapid mimicry and emotional contagion in domestic dogs. Palmer, C. Animal ethics in context. Parr, L. Facial expression categorization by chimpanzees using standardized stimuli.

Emotion 8, — Pettersson, H. Understanding of human communicative motives in domestic dogs. Pitteri, E. When rank counts—dominant dogs learn better from a human demonstrator in a two-action test. Behaviour , — Social learning in dogs: the effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs in a detour task.

Povinelli, D. Inferences about guessing and knowing by chimpanzees Pan troglodytes. Prato-Previde, E. Is the dog-human relationship an attachment bond?

Prinz, J. Purves, D. Meaning in the lives of humans and other animals. Quervel-Chaumette, M. Range, F. The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Attention in common marmosets: implications for social-learning experiments.

Automatic imitation in dogs. B , — Social learning from humans or conspecifics: differences and similarities between wolves and dogs. Wolves are better imitators of conspecifics than dogs. Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Regan, T. The case for animal rights, updated with a new preface.

Berkeley, L. A: University of California Press. Rowlands, M. Can animals be moral? Bernard came in last Heffner, Humans can locate sounds more precisely than dogs can. Psychologist Dr. Stanley Coren , p. The threshold of hearing is the sound pressure level at which a sound becomes audible.

At higher pitches, though, dogs have a lower threshold. That is, they can hear sounds at a lower volume than we can. This is a significant difference. At frequencies higher than 8, Hz, the discrepancy grows wider. There are many variables in play when sounds travel over a distance.

That 19 dB difference would correspond to a factor of four in loudness but not sound pressure level, sorry. The qualities listed above have to do with the physiological capabilities of hearing. Dogs can discriminate between pitches. They have been tested using both operant and respondent methods. They can likely perform even better. In one experiment, a single dog was able to discriminate between tones of 29, and 30, Hz Andreyev, A musician would call these settings differences in tempo.

Tempo is measured in beats per minute. For instance, in a tempo of 60 beats per minute, the beats are exactly one second apart. Dogs can discriminate between beats per minute and beats per minute Andreyev, To understand, try this online metronome.

Enter the setting of beats per minute, listen, then change it to beats per minute. Could you tell which one it was if someone played one of them for you out of the blue? Dogs can learn to categorize sounds. Does your dog discriminate the sound of your car from others? Ratcliffe et al similarly showed that dogs could likely discriminate voices by human gender, which may involve timbre discrimination. Since a lot of what comprises timbre is the overtone structure of a sound, timbre discrimination could be a subset of pitch discrimination.

These are tests to see if dogs can hear the difference between certain human-spoken consonant and vowel sounds.

For instance, Baru demonstrated that dogs could discriminate between the vowel sounds i and a. Athanasiadou tested vowel discrimination in dogs using the preferential looking paradigm. This is a noninvasive method used with human infants. The dogs could discriminate between the Dutch vowel sounds a and e. The discrimination abilities are taken as a given. If you are interested in speech sound discrimination, there is a review article by Kriengwatana et al that synopsizes a lot of that research for dogs and other animals and is available free online.

This article is a cornerstone for a new section of my blog devoted to dogs and sounds. I will be offering some very practical advice. However, human ears have a maximum sensitivity of 2, Hz. Not coincidentally, that frequency is right in the middle of the range of human speech. On the other hand, dogs have a maximum sensitivity of 8, Hz, much better suited to hearing their prey. Dogs also have an amazing ability to detect tiny differences between frequencies.

On the other hand, we can locate sounds better than dogs. Humans can tell the difference between two sounds that differ in location by an angle of only one degree, whereas dogs need eight degrees of separation. Researchers know what humans can hear because they can ask their test subjects, but how do they know what dogs can hear?

Early studies involved training dogs to press a lever under a speaker when they heard a sound. Sounds are played through the earphones, and if the brain shows electrical activity, the dog is considered to have heard the sound.

Just like humans, dogs can lose their hearing with age or from other factors, such as a severe ear infection.